bmiheader

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK

Public Archives Search

Keyword Search

STOCKS

Market quotes are powered by TradingView.com

Beer Insights Extras

Extra beer business news, thoughts and insights from the publishers of Beer Marketer’s Insights, Insights Express, Craft Brew News, Beverage Business Insights and Alcohol Issues Insights.

Founder Jerry Steinman celebrates 90th Birthday

Beer Marketer's Insights was founded in 1970 by Jerry Steinman.  Last Sunday, February 9th, he celebrated his 90th birthday at a Rockland County NY restaurant with grandson David, son Benj & daughter-in-law Robin.  Jerry was proud to be wearing a sport jacket that he first wore on his 50th birthday!  

b2ap3_thumbnail_Grandpa90v2.jpg

Continue reading
32910 Hits
0 Comments

“Dollars Up, Volume Down”

That’s the phrase we hear from most distribs in recent years when we ask “how’s business?”  No one wants the reverse, of course, and brewers and distributors alike are often more profitable than ever.  But many industry execs remain in a funk about soft total volume, especially big brewers whose fates and business models are tightly tied to mainstream brands/styles.  2013 will be the 4th volume loss in 5 years, unprecedented in modern times.  Since the formation of MillerCoors and AB InBev in 2008, those two brewers will have shed in the neighborhood of 17 mil bbls by the end of this year, and total industry shipments are likely to be at least 8 mil bbls lower than in that peak year 2008.

b2ap3_thumbnail_shipments-vs-ABMC.jpg

It’s no surprise then, that execs from AB (Dave Almeida), MillerCoors (Kevin Doyle) and Pabst (Kevin McAdams) all stressed at our Insights Seminar last month how important it is for “all segments” – including economy and premium, especially premium lights – to be healthy and growing, not just the high end.  On the other hand, Crown’s Bruce Jacobson and Boston Beer’s John Geist, while agreeing on the need for big, lead brands to be healthy, seemed far less concerned about driving overall industry volume.  Indeed, John talked about Boston being happy to grab some of the estimated 3 mil bbls dripping from the “leaky bucket” that’s mainstream beer right now.   Recall too, John’s boss Jim Koch has pointed out that craft brewers define themselves, at least in part, in opposition to big brewers.  That’s even while Kevin warned that losing a premium light beer drinkers is “especially” bad for craft since they are often the same drinkers.  Kevin also mentioned that the “real issue” is declining per capita beer consumption, while wine and spirits per caps are growing.

Why is industry volume so soft?  And what could/should be done to reverse the trend?  The usual suspects for volume woes are:

  • economic factors that have hit mainstream beer drinkers harder than craft/import drinkers poor weather comps (especially in early 2013)
  • outperformance by spirits and wine
  • more aggressive beer price increases, especially since 2008 and especially vis a vis spirits and wine
  • less-than-spectacular marketing by big brewers
  • a volume hit from craft as some consumers are drinking “better, but less”

b2ap3_thumbnail_Dan-quote.jpg

In the past, AB execs have cited some of the above, adding the payroll tax as another 2013 hitch, but more recently have suggested that economics/labor force participation are by far the dominant factors.  MC’s Tom Long recently suggested that a 2-point reduction in the unemployment rate would “dramatically help” the premium light segment.  But I suspect each of the factors above (except weather in the long run) have played a significant role, though reasonable minds can differ about their respective impacts.  Another issue, tied to marketing and the spirits/wine success: Heineken USA’s Dolf van den Brink, again at our Seminar, discussed the importance of forging much stronger ties between beer and multi-cultural and female consumers.  (There’s a 23-point difference in the percentage of males and females who drink beer, 56% vs 33%, while the corresponding numbers for spirits are 44% and 42%.)

Not much can be done, by any brewer, about factors #1 and #2.  Kevin, David and others have talked about “educating” retailers about some “basic math” of beer: it turns faster than other categories at retail and thus deserves more space and merchandising than it’s getting.  AB and MC are spending vast sums of money to educate retailers. David showed some data that “proves” its “balanced portfolio” approach “works for retailers” to build the category.  MC claims that where it’s the “category captain,” stores outperform.  We’ll see whether these efforts impact space, merchandising and volume going forward.

Outperformance by wine and spirits has been going on for over a decade and shows little sign of an abrupt halt.  The reasons for their outperformance are a combination of:

  • pendulum swing (beer couldn’t kick spirits’ ass forever and American wine consumption couldn’t stay as low as it had forever)
  • spirits companies’ decision to advertise on cable at a particularly ripe time when rates were low and channels exploding
  • more impactful creative (in some cases)
  • public policy wins (Sunday sales, etc)
  • more aggressive beer price hikes, especially on subpremiums, which drove some consumers to drink something else (i.e. lower-priced spirits)
  • on-premise efforts by spirits which helped give rise to cocktail culture and creative mixology
  • popularity of flavored spirits
  • those more balanced demographics

b2ap3_thumbnail_Abs-Alc-share.jpg

Again, how one weighs these factors can be debated, but they add up to a hit on beer.  Big brewers have targeted spirits occasions with new products (Platinum, Ritas, Redd’s) with varying success and will likely do more of the same in the future.  As one craft brewer recently said: “We’re doing our part,” by attracting wine/spirits drinkers to switch (on occasion), pairing beer with food and offering a higher-priced/image product.  But don’t expect craft brewers, or major importers like Crown and Heineken USA, to do much to drive economy or premium light brands.  They don’t sell them and craft/import growth is dependent in significant part upon cannibalizing that volume.  And there’s still a ton of meat on those bones: over 140 mil bbls/yr, give or take.  To the extent big import brands are “mainstream,” Crown and HUSA may be more concerned about overall volume than craft brewers, but not nearly as much as AB and MC.

Net-net: the top 2, and to a lesser extent Pabst, have a huge challenge on their hands.  To keep their breweries running efficiently they do need to press against the entire business and a number of weak but still-large brands in their portfolios, while expanding innovation via new brands and packages.  And each has also launched significant, separate on-premise initiatives.  That’s a lot of balls to juggle, in addition to keeping an eye on the economy and Diageo, Gallo, et al.  Crown is clicking right now, has a demographic tailwind in the growth of the Hispanic population and a large brewery to expand.  Similarly, HUSA will be focused on the import drinker, multi-culturals and again exclusively the high end.  Meanwhile, unless and until craft segment growth – which is coming in large part from mainstream beer – ends, craft brewers will no doubt continue to focus their efforts on a much more limited landscape: literally fewer geographic markets in some cases, a smaller population of drinkers and a much narrower band of marketing options for all.  That’s even while simultaneously broadening their brands’ appeal.  Competitively, they’ll be far more focused on big brewers’ craft-like entries and the endless stream of new craft brewers entering the market, not on ways to shore up total industry volume.

None of this bodes well for turning the volume tide anytime soon.  Perhaps we’ll get that 2-point reduction in the unemployment rate.  Perhaps AB has “cracked the code,” as it sez it has, on Bud Light marketing and MC will figure out how to fix some of the legacy Miller brands.  Perhaps more women will discover the joys of beer and more adults will “come back” from spirits and/or wine.  Maybe pricing trends will change to make beer a better buy in the eyes of entry level drinkers.  But each and any of those would be a mighty big change.  In the alternative, “dollars up, volume down” seems a more likely alternative, and perhaps the best we can hope for, in the short run.

Continue reading
32541 Hits
0 Comments

Archive Diving for Throwback Thursday

Beer Marketer’s Insights has been walking this beer biz beat for a while now, leaving us with 40+ years of archived text.  Sounds like a perfect opportunity to participate in Throwback Thursday (#tbt out here in the wilds of the web) to us.  Expect to see us dive into our archives more often on Thursdays and share what we find right here.

For our first #tbt post, we looked at our flagship publication, Beer Marketer’s Insights from 20 years ago.  1993.  In many ways, a very different beer industry.  But disagreements between tiers over state franchise laws have been fairly constant, even if the individuals, specific issues and even some association names have changed.

--

Calif Bill Package in 94?  Biggie Support?  Now Calif Small Brewers Anti Franchise Law (published Nov 29, 1993)

In lively session at BAA meeting (Brewers Association of America), Roger Hanney, veep of Calif beer distribs assn, said all 7 bills in legislative package to shore up 3-tier system are "still alive and well," tho didn't pass this yr. "We believe we could get it (the package) through to the governor in 94," Roger added, but distribs "don't necessarily have wholehearted support of major brewers."  Calif small brewers, staunch ally of beleaguered Calif beer distribs on this bill package, part ways with distribs on franchise law. Robert Judd, exec dir of Calif Small Brewers Assn (now 85-90 small brewers, includ­ing brewpubs) told BAA his members were "the 1st and only brewers to go out and sup­port" Calif beer wholesalers legislative package.  "We received the criticism of the major brewers" for that support, Bob added.  But he warned that Calif small brewers "oppose the franchise bill as proposed."  Don't like such fundamental provisions, like exclusive territories. Bob said his members view franchise bill as "in effect, a 'no-divorce' law."  Roger responded:  "You can't have it both ways," meaning that if small brewers are with wholesalers, must understand need for franchise law to preserve 3-tier system.  "We can't sit back and do nothing or we won't have the system," Roger added....  A few days later, Wall St Jnl, in long, overly pessimistic article on beer wholesaling, quoted prexy of Calif Grocers Assn on 3-tier system: "It's an antiquated system.  Eventually it must be changed.... The major brewers know they've got to change. It's happening today in all other products."  Meanwhile, top AB brass including August III recently met with distribs in Calif and pledged continued support of 3-tier system.

Continue reading
33066 Hits
0 Comments